<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Make My Technology Simple &#187; computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/tag/computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com</link>
	<description>Taking the Mystery out of Computer Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>My Client&#8217;s Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2011/10/11/my-clients-advocate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2011/10/11/my-clients-advocate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Schierer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advocate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all the advertising and sales pitches that we come across these days it is not wonder we are all confused. Sometimes we &#8216;settle&#8217; for things just because it is easier and less stressful to &#8216;settle&#8217; for something that is close to what we want instead of finding that person that can an advocate for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the advertising and sales pitches that we come across these days it is not wonder we are all confused. Sometimes we &#8216;settle&#8217; for things just because it is easier and less stressful to &#8216;settle&#8217; for something that is close to what we want instead of finding that person that can an advocate for them. Do you have someone like this in your life? To some it is a board of directors. To others it is their spouse or mentor. </p>
<p>I named my company, &#8220;Make My Technology Simple&#8221; because before I started the actual company and was doing it part time, I was always hearing from my clients how I made things so simple for them. They never walked away in a daze because I talked over their heads. I would tell them about what they needed in a new PC or server and why, in terms that they understood. I also told them why others told them differently. </p>
<p>I guess I am kind of a rare breed of business owner. I put my clients first. Instead of going for that quick fix and moving on, I spend time with them. Find out what they really need and want. Do they truly understand the consequences of buying new or staying with what they have. </p>
<p>A lot of my clients are one time consultations. I resolve their problems in a permanent way. I spend a little time instructing them on how not to get back into the situation that they found themselves. Sometimes it is simply telling a client that downloading music files from a file sharing site is almost a guaranteed way of getting a virus. Now, what is more economic to you? Download a free song and get a virus and a bill from me for $150? Or buy songs from approved of sites for .99 or $1.99 each and not see me at all? You can get 70-150 songs for the price of me removing a free virus! </p>
<p>So I try to be an advocate to my clients so that we put the right combination of software and hardware together for their company&#8217;s needs and the client now can concentrate on working their business and not having downtime or added costs because of viruses or mismatched systems. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2011/10/11/my-clients-advocate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Virus Again Proven Largely Ineffective</title>
		<link>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2010/04/06/anti-virus-again-proven-largely-ineffective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2010/04/06/anti-virus-again-proven-largely-ineffective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 18:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rich Schierer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malicious code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2010/04/06/anti-virus-again-proven-largely-ineffective/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an excerpt from a colleague of mine&#8217;s blog at http://viprisk.blogspot.com/ 08 February 2010 VIPRISK INTELL ITEM 08FEB10-01 TITLE: Anti-Virus Again Proven Largely Ineffective BYLINE: Even users running up-to-date anti-virus software still get infected with malware, according to stats from an online malware scanning service. Nearly a third (25,000 out of 78,800) of computers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excerpt from a colleague of mine&#8217;s blog at http://viprisk.blogspot.com/ </p>
<p>08 February 2010<br />
VIPRISK INTELL ITEM 08FEB10-01 TITLE: Anti-Virus Again Proven Largely Ineffective<br />
BYLINE:<br />
Even users running up-to-date anti-virus software still get infected with malware, according to stats from an online malware scanning service. Nearly a third (25,000 out of 78,800) of computers with up-to-date anti-virus software were discovered to be infected with malicious code when users scanned their PC using SurfRight&#8217;s HitmanPro 3 behavioral scan. SurfRight&#8217;s analysis is based on 107,435 users who put their PC through its scanner between 10 October and 4 December 2009. Around a quarter of these users (28,608) either had no scanner installed or were running security software that was out of date.</p>
<p>WHO IS AT RISK: ALL Windows PC-based users of commercial anti-virus software (90% of the computing world).</p>
<p>WHY YOU CARE:<br />
The purpose of this intell item is not to highlight a particular product &#8211; Maverick is product agnostic. The purpose is to make users aware of the ineffectiveness of an industry that has consistently failed them since 1999. The exercise by the product does illustrate the problem that running the latest version of antivirus software is no guarantee against malware infection, contrary to what the marketing department of many security software firms have historically said.</p>
<p>WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT:<br />
Keep your AV in place, and keep it up-to-date. But also, combine that with smart surfing (carefully examining links and sites before you click on them &#8211; and use legitimate providers), filtering at the Internet Access Points, only downloading attachments from known (good) providers, and using the strongest browsers (alternatives to Internet Explorer). Those at particular risk should consider the use of secured bootable media for high-risk transactions, such as online banking, data transfers, or shopping.<br />
Posted by VIPRisk (www.viprisk.com) at 13:58 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.makemytechnologysimple.com/2010/04/06/anti-virus-again-proven-largely-ineffective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

